Skip to content

Fediverse Enhancement Proposals

2 Topics 128 Posts View Original
  • FEP-4772: Representing bookmarks

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    0 Views
    bouncepaw@socialhub.activitypub.rocksB
    silverpill:Shouldn’t it be a custom type? E.g. Bookmark?You can state that Note may be used instead of the custom type if compatibility with Mastodon is required.I don't think there's a single federated bookmark manager that doesn't want Mastodon compatibility. Bookmark managers would almost always be second accounts on Fediverse, and they are usually followed from microblogging instances (judging by my followers).Moreover, supporting the Note form would be a must either way; there are older instances of Betula online who haven't been updating for a year or two already. Would it make sense for Bookmark to exist then if every bookmark manager supported Note? I don't think soPerhaps this is some form of Mastodon-fatalism on my side though. silverpill:Why FEP-dd4b? It has no implementations.I picked the wrong link. I meant FEP-044f.Thanks for the feedback, here and on Codeberg.
  • silverpill:

    125
    0 Votes
    125 Posts
    0 Views
    silverpill@mitra.socialS
    I agree, it should be changed to MUST. I used other types for custom cryptosuites while the Data Integrity spec was still a draft, but today any custom cryptosuite can be specified using the cryptosuite property.