<![CDATA[Regarding the validity of at:// URIs in atproto:]]>Regarding the validity of at:// URIs in atproto:

https://bnewbold.leaflet.pub/3mph4hzvbdc2v

We have a similar problem with FEP-ef61 'ap' URIs. In their canonical form, they are not valid RFC-3986 URIs.

I think if atproto devs decide to move away from ://did:.. syntax, we'll have to do that as well.

#fep_ef61

]]>https://fedi.wiki/topic/a9782657-1aa9-4768-9b16-6f8a0f7b3631/regarding-the-validity-of-at-uris-in-atprotoRSS for NodeSun, 26 Jul 2026 02:08:53 GMTMon, 29 Jun 2026 19:45:16 GMT60