@Profpatsch >In order to combat this, we need to add friction to posting. The most obvious solution here is to add transaction cost in addition to moderation.No, just no. The obvious solution to the spam problem is moderation and filtering tools that don't suck and are configurable and ideally writeable by the admins. Simple heuristics like mentions spam, keywords, account age at the time of federation and soft/hard limits where posts are hidden/dropped go a long way and are relatively easy to write and configure. The spam problem is bad on Mastodon only because Mastodon refuses to implement actually functional moderation and filtering tools for some reason.fedi-mastodon-gold-account.webpmastodon-battlepass.jpg

@PuercoPop Yes, but why do you want to store the response? HTTP signatures are not supposed to be re-used.

@mayel no, beyond what Holos suggested, I'm not aware of any.

That's the plan. I am trying to introduce new features (such as fine-grained permissions) while keeping it as close to existing implementations as possible.@nutomic @rimu

@maddyunderstars Your FEP has been added to the repository: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/bebd/fep-bebd.md@julian Private FEP-1b12 groups exist in Lemmy 1.0beta. I am already testing them, but there are still some issues with the federation (I am also working on a FEP that covers access control and user roles in FEP-1b12 groups)

@julian@activitypub.space @liaizon@social.wake.st We laid out the details of our fediverse strategy and cooperation with bonfire in this blog post: lauti.org/blog/lauti-updates... And overall we collaborate with Mobilizon and Gancio @lesion@mastodon.cisti.org via @linos@graz.social @blog@event-federation.eu and the FEP-8a8e. All plan to implement that to have a common base for federating events. Not sure how far the implementation on their side is. @linos@graz.social do you know more? Would be awesome if NodeBB also supports the FEP in the future. codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/s...

@maddyunderstars@aus.social I should note that there's no requirement for it to be on SocialHub. A thread on aus.social works just as well, it all counts.

@ariaflame Just checked, it doesn’t have scheduling.

@memoria @suetanvil Given you didn't even ask me for information about my estimate, and simply said what you said — it feels like you aren't having a discussion in good faith.

@steve Regarding Create and Updates activities for content that has been deleted —...These could always be turned into Tombstones.Which is easier to do with separate activity documents being pointed to from the outbox....But, if the software wants to completely purge this data, then that would force a cache invalidation potentially across many collection pages.

@julian @reiver @technical-discussion I had the same question!

RE: https://techhub.social/@fedicon/116665644723775770️ Today is the last day to get DISCOUNTED EARLY BIRD tickets for FediCon 2026 — don't miss your chance to grab a discounted pass!(Tickets will be regularly priced after today.) August 6–9, 2026 UBC campus, Vancouver, BC Get your FOSSY ticket, which gets you into FediCon:https://2026.fossy.ca/attend/tickets/#FediCon #FediCon2026 #FOSSY #FOSSY2026 #FediDev #Fediverse

@lauti It's okay, Lemmy and Friendica put a server actor there.>activity delivery issuesMy server drops your Accept activity because you don't sign the Digest header.

You would not believe the amount of energy in the #fedidev community right now. It’s incredible.Feels like especially Europe is so ready to break out of the US tech monopoly era and go back to proper healthy ways of doing business, where everybody can benefit.#hopecore

I just added an issue to the nodeinfo repo about bots and groups: https://github.com/jhass/nodeinfo/issues/110 Has anyone else dealt with this before?

Understood, so the mod check is done but also accepts origin-based security as per fe34. That actually does make sense and allows for cross-origin moderation.

@julian @benpate fixed on WordPress.com! (it was a CORS issue, because the API runs under a different domain on DotCom).You should now be able to test on activitypub.blog

Thanks @chocobozzz@framapiaf.org for the explanation. It does seem like the library is still usable. In a separate thread, @mradcliffe@nokoto.org mentioned that he had a PR/branch that introduced RFC 9421 support: https://nokoto.org/user/3/replies/317 It looks like you're the maintainer... would you be open to having that merged if someone (aka me) implements and tests it?

@evan 429? Amateur hour. You need to keep banging on the API until the server is overwhelmed and times out. That's the 2026 way.

@julian @technical-discussion @evan pleroma ships a /relay actor turned on by default that follows back other relays, this server subscribes to a thousand or so of them, announces get turned into remotefetches for efficiency, and the network is filled effortlessly without follow for follow bottingwish the network had some sort of shared as:public /outbox too for backfill